What did you think of the Grammys?
I thought this:
1. Three-and-a-half hours to give 10 awards?? This should not be called an awards show; this should be called A Whole Lot Of People Getting Together To Perform show.
2. I love The Police. They were my favorite band in high school and I was super-psyched about them opening the show. But I think they need a few more rehearsals before they take it out on the road.
3. Whoever produced that show is a complete moron.
4. The stage in the middle of the audience was awkward.
5. Singers in general and the Dixie Chicks in particular give horrible acceptance speeches.
6. The quality of the performances was about a 3 on a scale of 1 to 10.
7. Especially that guy who calls himself after the basketball player.
8. The Carrie Underwood/Rascal Flatts performance went on about 10 minutes longer than necessary.
9. And it's really distracting how she keeps moving her hands from one to the other on the microphone. Someone needs to break her of that habit immediately.
10. The Grammys seem to be the only major awards program that takes commercial success into account. Could you imagine if the Oscars did that? The Oscar for Best Film would be a toss-up between Pirates of the Caribbean and Cars.
Labels: award shows, celebs
Best way to watch the Grammys - T.I.V.O. I'm pissed that only a few awards were given on TV this year - and you're right - the producer has officially hit moron status!!! Ugh!
They better be fabulous on the 50th!!
Posted by
Lys |
6:21 PM